Open Access
Rights, recourse to the courts and the relationship between religion, law and state in Europe and the United States
avs request failed
Loading...
Files
RSCAS_2016_09.pdf (347.73 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1028-3625
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
EUI RSCAS; 2016/09; RELIGIOWEST
Cite
MCCREA, Ronan, Rights, recourse to the courts and the relationship between religion, law and state in Europe and the United States, EUI RSCAS, 2016/09, RELIGIOWEST - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/38812
Abstract
This paper compares the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights and the US Supreme Court to show the weakness of rights-based justifications such as those suggested by Sager and Eisgruber, Dworkin and Nussabaum, for the strict religious neutrality of the state. Justifying secularism in rights terms is likely to lead to minimialist forms of secularism and risks drawing courts into problematic assessments of the compatibility of the beliefs of particular faiths with liberal democracy. The paper closes by suggesting that rights-based litigation is a problematic vehicle through which to regulate the relationship between religion, the law and the state as fundamental rights cannot do justice either to the reasons in favour of strict separation of religion and state or to the richness of religious experience.