Date: 2015
Type: Contribution to book
Deontic defeasible reasoning in legal interpretation : two options for modelling interpretive arguments
ICAIL '15 Proceedings of the 15th International conference on artificial intelligence and law, New York : ACM New York, 2015, pp. 99-108
ROTOLO, Antonino, GOVERNATORI, Guido, SARTOR, Giovanni, Deontic defeasible reasoning in legal interpretation : two options for modelling interpretive arguments, in ICAIL '15 Proceedings of the 15th International conference on artificial intelligence and law, New York : ACM New York, 2015, pp. 99-108
- https://hdl.handle.net/1814/38824
Retrieved from Cadmus, EUI Research Repository
This paper offers a new logical machinery for reasoning about interpretive canons. We identify some options for modelling reasoning about interpretations and show that interpretative argumentation has a distinctive structure where the claim that a legal text ought or may be interpreted in a certain way can be supported or attacked by arguments, whose conflicts may have to be assessed according to further arguments.
Cadmus permanent link: https://hdl.handle.net/1814/38824
Full-text via DOI: 10.1145/2746090.2746100
ISBN: 9781450335225
Files associated with this item
| Files | Size | Format | View |
|---|---|---|---|
|
There are no files associated with this item. |
|||