Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorROTOLO, Antonino
dc.contributor.authorGOVERNATORI, Guido
dc.contributor.authorSARTOR, Giovanni
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-03T15:49:30Z
dc.date.available2016-02-03T15:49:30Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationICAIL '15 Proceedings of the 15th International conference on artificial intelligence and law, New York : ACM New York, 2015, pp. 99-108en
dc.identifier.isbn9781450335225
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/38824
dc.description.abstractThis paper offers a new logical machinery for reasoning about interpretive canons. We identify some options for modelling reasoning about interpretations and show that interpretative argumentation has a distinctive structure where the claim that a legal text ought or may be interpreted in a certain way can be supported or attacked by arguments, whose conflicts may have to be assessed according to further arguments.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleDeontic defeasible reasoning in legal interpretation : two options for modelling interpretive argumentsen
dc.typeContribution to booken
dc.identifier.doi10.1145/2746090.2746100


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record