Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorROTOLO, Antonino
dc.contributor.authorGOVERNATORI, Guido
dc.contributor.authorSARTOR, Giovanni
dc.identifier.citationICAIL '15 Proceedings of the 15th International conference on artificial intelligence and law, New York : ACM New York, 2015, pp. 99-108en
dc.description.abstractThis paper offers a new logical machinery for reasoning about interpretive canons. We identify some options for modelling reasoning about interpretations and show that interpretative argumentation has a distinctive structure where the claim that a legal text ought or may be interpreted in a certain way can be supported or attacked by arguments, whose conflicts may have to be assessed according to further arguments.en
dc.titleDeontic defeasible reasoning in legal interpretation : two options for modelling interpretive argumentsen
dc.typeContribution to booken

Files associated with this item


There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record