Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMAVROIDIS, Petros C.
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-09T10:07:27Z
dc.date.available2016-03-09T10:07:27Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.citationEuropean journal of risk regulation, 2015, Vol. 6, No. 3, pp. 388-395
dc.identifier.issn1867-299X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/39333
dc.description.abstractIn EC-Seal Products, the WTO Appellate Body (AB) issued a(nother) controversial report. This paper argues that the analysis followed by the AB is wrong. To prove this point, we ask two questions. Would the AB have concluded the same way if it had constructed the EU measure as two separate measures and not one? Did the AB adequately control for the regulatory intent of the EU, indeed the quintessential element for deciding whether the EU was indeed pursuing a societal preference of no commercial character? We responded in the negative to both questions.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean journal of risk regulation
dc.titleSymposium on the EU-seal products case. Sealed with a doubt : EU, seals and the WTO
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.13140/RG.2.1.4514.2245
dc.identifier.volume6
dc.identifier.startpage388
dc.identifier.endpage395
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue3


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record