Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCLOSA, Carlos
dc.contributor.authorPALESTINI CÉSPEDES, Stefano
dc.contributor.authorCASTILLO ORTIZ, Pablo
dc.date.accessioned2016-08-31T15:02:50Z
dc.date.available2016-08-31T15:02:50Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationHamburg : EU LAC Foundation, 2016en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/43086
dc.description.abstractHow can regional organisations such as the EU, the OAS and UNASUR contribute to the protection of democracy in their respective member states? This study explores the performance of regional organisations in Latin America, the Caribbean and the European Union and concludes that governments design democracy protection mechanisms with a strong intergovernmental bias that gives ample political discretion in reacting to eventual violations by offenders. The European Union, Latin America and the Caribbean have experienced successive waves of democratisation. Starting from the 1970s, almost all countries in both regions can be qualified as democratic. In several cases, though, these democracies can be labelled as imperfect. Moreover, some countries have experienced instances of anti-democratic involution (in the most extreme cases) or an erosion of democratic institutions. Membership of regional organisations has contributed greatly to transition to democracy and democratic consolidation. Both scholars and political leaders perceive that regional organisations have played a significant role, among other mechanisms through democratic conditionality. In most cases, these regional organisations have included provisions to verify that their member states remain democratic (and/or obey other values such as rule of law). But the relationship between the mechanisms for scrutinising compliance with these values and the performance of the organisation applying them remains underexplored. This study analyses the institutional design of mechanisms of democracy protection (MDPs) in regional organisations in the European Union, Latin America and the Caribbean. Three elements of the institutional design result particularly relevant: the procedures for activation of MDPs and the role of different actors (i.e. governments and/or autonomous organisation bodies); the mechanism for verification and review; and the type of sanctions in combination with the procedures to adopt them. The study concludes by making the case that intergovernmental decision-making for MDPs leaves ample room for political discretion and suggests a number of possible elements for improving institutional design.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Governance Programmeen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEuropean, Transnational and Global Governanceen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subject.otherComparative regional integration and regionalism
dc.subject.otherEuropean governance
dc.subject.otherInstitutions and policy-making
dc.subject.otherTransnationalism
dc.titleRegional organisations and mechanisms for democracy protection in Latin America, the Caribbean, and the European Unionen
dc.title.alternativeOrganizaciones regionales y mecanismos de protección de la democracia en América Latina, el Caribe, y la Unión Europea
dc.typeBooken
dc.identifier.doi10.12858/0716en1
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record