Open Access
Ask for the moon, settle for the stars : what is a reasonable period to comply with WTO awards?
Loading...
Files
RSCAS_2016_45.pdf (789.83 KB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1028-3625
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Citation
EUI RSCAS; 2016/45; Global Governance Programme-229; Global Economics
Cite
MAVROIDIS, Petros C., MEAGHER, Niall, PRUSA, Thomas J., YANGUAS, Tatiana, Ask for the moon, settle for the stars : what is a reasonable period to comply with WTO awards?, EUI RSCAS, 2016/45, Global Governance Programme-229, Global Economics - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/43256
Abstract
The World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute settlement process allows a defending Member a “reasonable period of time” (RPT) to implement any findings that its contested measures are inconsistent with WTO law. If agreement on this RPT cannot be reached, Article 21.3(c) of the Understanding on Rules and Procedures Governing the Settlement of Disputes (DSU) provides for the possibility of arbitration on the length of the RPT. The DSU provides limited guidelines on the RPT, stating only that it should not normally exceed 15 months. In practice, Arbitrators have developed the standard that the RPT should reflect the shortest possible period under the domestic legal system of the defending Member to make the changes necessary to comply with the WTO rulings. Our research confirms that in practice Arbitrators have determined this period by “splitting the difference” approximately between the periods suggested by the complaining and defending Member. In addition, the process appears to reward defending Members that request an RPT that exceeds the 15-month guideline in Article 21.3(c).