Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLESSA KERSTENETZKY, Celia
dc.date.accessioned2017-06-30T13:44:23Z
dc.date.available2017-06-30T13:44:23Z
dc.date.issued1999
dc.identifier.citationDados, 1999, Vol.42, No. 3, pp. 453-470en
dc.identifier.issn0011-5258
dc.identifier.issn1678-4588
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/47086
dc.description.abstractIn an examination of Hayek's social philosophy, the article seeks to distinguish between socio-epistemological arguments, which postulate the radical ignorance of social actors, and the conservative political conclusions usually associated with Hayek's thought, which prophesy the destruction of the spontaneous order owing to efforts to intervene in the social world. The ultimate purpose of drawing this distinction is to lay the ground for a discussion of a new alliance, one between these arguments and the possibility of design. This exploration of multi-sided Hayekian argumentation allows us to identify some ambiguities essential towards the article's purposes. The most important ambiguity appears in the argument against planned changes, where Hayek describes the foreseeable negative consequences of such changes and also sketches the scenario shaped by the foreseeable beneficial effects of the undisturbed operation of the spontaneous order.en
dc.language.isopten
dc.relation.ispartofDadosen
dc.relation.isbasedonhttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/5188
dc.titleEvolução e desígnio em Hayeken
dc.title.alternativeEvolution and design in Hayek
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1590/S0011-52581999000300003
dc.identifier.volume42en
dc.identifier.startpage453en
dc.identifier.endpage470en
dc.identifier.issue3en
dc.description.versionThe article is a revised version of the author’s EUI PhD thesis, 1998


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record