The Islamists’ compromise in Tunisia
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
1086-3214; 1045-5736
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Journal of democracy, 2015, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 110-124
Cite
NETTERSTRØM, Kasper Ly, The Islamists’ compromise in Tunisia, Journal of democracy, 2015, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 110-124 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/47325
Abstract
By voting for Tunisia’s new constitution in January 2014, the Islamist party Ennahda accepted many principles that were in contradiction with Islamist ideology. Most importantly, the party accepted the principle of freedom of consciousness and the absence of a reference to Sharia. This paper argues that, contrary to many theories in the field, the Islamists conceded solely out of necessity. However, after the concessions the leadership of the party uncovered new interpretations of Islam and Islamism in order to persuade the party members to support the constitution. This way, the Islamists unwillingly brought about a secularization of the political sphere in Tunisia.