dc.contributor.author | PIEBALGS, Andris | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2017-07-31T14:19:09Z | |
dc.date.available | 2017-07-31T14:19:09Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9789290844778 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2467-4540 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/47527 | |
dc.description.abstract | • Much has been written and commented, in recent years, about the Baltic States and their delicate position – both geographically and politically speaking – concerning security of gas supply and energy independence from Russia. • While it’s no secret that the region has for a long time been quasi totally dependent from Gazprom imports, the profound, sometimes inevitable reasons of such vulnerability are not evident. At the same time – and consequently - the implications and ‘side effects’ of some energy policy and regulatory choices taken in this region are not the same as in any other country in Europe. • If we do not understand this, it becomes very difficult to see why the decision to open an LNG terminal in this region (Klaipeda) is welcome as ‘a symbol of energy independence’; and it becomes even harder to accept that the sudden, unfair price increase to gas customers by the incumbent company is publicly justified as the answer to the ‘inadequate’ choices - legitimately taken - by a country’s government. • As the title suggests, since they joined the Union in 2004, the Baltic countries have been the theatre of a delicate test for EU-Russia relations – which we might consider as still ongoing. • Since then, Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia have undergone a resolute path towards liberalization and diversification of energy sources – which will eventually lead these countries to becoming a single entryexit zone in 2020. But the road has been long and rocky. • That’s what this work by former Commissioner Andris Piebalgs is about, seen with the eyes of an expert and at the same time a ‘local’ belonging to the region (Andris Piebalgs is from and has lived most of his life in Latvia). • This paper is not really a Policy Brief strictu sensu, but rather a photography: by reading it, the reader is not told any ‘pre-packaged’ truth but, on the contrary, he/she is guided through the recent history of the Baltic states and given the instruments to find out – by himself – the ‘why’ and ‘how’ of the delicate gas policy choices made by the Baltic countries. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Policy Briefs | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2017/16 | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Florence School of Regulation | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Energy | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | Gas | en |
dc.relation.uri | http://fsr.eui.eu/ | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en |
dc.title | The Baltic litmus test for gas | en |
dc.type | Other | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2870/77496 | |
eui.subscribe.skip | true | |