Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKOCHENOV, Dimitry
dc.contributor.authorVAN WOLFEREN, Matthijs
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-26T11:17:28Z
dc.date.available2018-01-26T11:17:28Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1725-6739
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/50764
dc.description.abstractDialogue between different jurisdictional levels within complex constitutional systems is constantly on-going. Within the EU, this dialogue is an indispensable condition for the functioning of the Rule of Law, described as the tension between gubernaculum (the body of positive law) and jurisdictio (the principles of law beyond the sovereign’s reach). Unlike other constitutional systems where the dialogue between the legislature and the judiciary plays the crucial role, the interaction between national courts and the Court of Justice of the EU is the only way through which the EU can be precluded from becoming a self-defining, tyrannical, constitutional order. As national courts seek to protect their constitutional values, they supply an important source of jurisdictio. Although the EU system offers a wider understanding of dialogical frameworks, it is under threat of dissolution. Where the Court of Justice feigns to cherish this inter-judicial dialogue, in reality it relies on its own supremacy to construct the EU.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI LAWen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2018/01en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectRule of Lawen
dc.subjectJudicial dialogueen
dc.subjectEU federalismen
dc.subjectSupremacyen
dc.subjectConstitutionalismen
dc.titleDialogical rule of law and the breakdown of dialogue in the EUen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record