dc.contributor.author | TESCHE, Tobias | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2018-08-02T08:29:38Z | |
dc.date.available | 2018-08-02T08:29:38Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2464-3270 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/57464 | |
dc.description | Published online 3 Jul 2018 | en |
dc.description.abstract | This article shows that the troika institutions — the European Commission, the European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) — formed a technocratic consensus about the desirability of establishing national fiscal councils in the European Union (EU). Considerable disagreement existed, however, with regards to their design features. Each institution promoted a distinct mode of indirect governance by ranking national fiscal councils depending on their adopted governance model (agent, trustee or orchestrator). This persuasion through entrepreneurial bench- marking constitutes an important mechanism by which member states were nudged to adopt a distinct fiscal council model. Preference heterogeneity among the troika members ultimately prevented the spread of a one-size-fits-all fiscal council in the EU. | en |
dc.format.mimetype | application/pdf | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | TARN Working Paper | en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | 2018/03 | en |
dc.relation.isreplacedby | http://hdl.handle.net/1814/62526 | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en |
dc.subject | Fiscal policy | en |
dc.subject | Independent fiscal councils | en |
dc.subject | Indirect governance | en |
dc.subject | International organisations | en |
dc.subject | Orchestration | en |
dc.title | 'The troika is dead, long live the domestic troikas?' : varieties of technocracy and the diffusion of national fiscal councils in the European Union : agents, trustees or orchestrators of fiscal discipline? | en |
dc.type | Working Paper | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.2139/ssrn.3202232 | |