Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTESCHE, Tobias
dc.date.accessioned2018-08-02T08:29:38Z
dc.date.available2018-08-02T08:29:38Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn2464-3270
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/57464
dc.descriptionPublished online 3 Jul 2018en
dc.description.abstractThis article shows that the troika institutions — the European Commission, the European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) — formed a technocratic consensus about the desirability of establishing national fiscal councils in the European Union (EU). Considerable disagreement existed, however, with regards to their design features. Each institution promoted a distinct mode of indirect governance by ranking national fiscal councils depending on their adopted governance model (agent, trustee or orchestrator). This persuasion through entrepreneurial bench- marking constitutes an important mechanism by which member states were nudged to adopt a distinct fiscal council model. Preference heterogeneity among the troika members ultimately prevented the spread of a one-size-fits-all fiscal council in the EU.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesTARN Working Paperen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2018/03en
dc.relation.isreplacedbyhttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/62526
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectFiscal policyen
dc.subjectIndependent fiscal councilsen
dc.subjectIndirect governanceen
dc.subjectInternational organisationsen
dc.subjectOrchestrationen
dc.title'The troika is dead, long live the domestic troikas?' : varieties of technocracy and the diffusion of national fiscal councils in the European Union : agents, trustees or orchestrators of fiscal discipline?en
dc.typeWorking Paperen
dc.identifier.doi10.2139/ssrn.3202232


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record