Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCANTORE, Carlo Maria
dc.contributor.authorMAVROIDIS, Petros C.
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-25T14:46:27Z
dc.date.available2018-09-25T14:46:27Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1028-3625
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/59004
dc.description.abstractThe CJEU has become a gatekeeper. Ever since Opinion 1/91, the CJEU has been imposing barriers to the recognition of decisions by foreign jurisdictions. Its recent Achmea decision is the natural consequence of case law so far. This attitude would not be problematic by itself since, through this attitude, the European Union would still be liable at the international plane, even if it did not implement its international obligations (liability- over property rules). This is not the end of the story. The CJEU accepts the, in principle, relevance of decisions by some international jurisdictions. However, the CJEU has repeatedly failed to establish clear criteria to identify ex ante the circumstances under which this will be the case. As things stand, recognition of foreign judgments is more of a line in the sand, than a dictum set in stone. This attitude is hardly reconcilable with the quintessential elements of a Rechtsstaat.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI RSCASen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2018/47en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Governance Programme-315en
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Global Economics]en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectAchmeaen
dc.subjectCJEUen
dc.subjectIntra-EU BITsen
dc.subjectPreliminary rulingsen
dc.subject.otherTrade, investment and international cooperation
dc.titleAnother one BITes the dust : the distance between Luxembourg and the world is growing after Achmeaen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record