Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBODEA, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorHIGASHIJIMA, Masaaki
dc.date.accessioned2018-11-28T13:13:42Z
dc.date.available2018-11-28T13:13:42Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationBritish journal of political science, 2017, Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 47-70
dc.identifier.issn0007-1234
dc.identifier.issn1469-2112EN
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/59690
dc.descriptionPublished online: 15 July 2015
dc.description.abstractIndependent central banks prefer balanced budgets due to the long-run connection between deficits and inflation, and can enforce their preference through interest rate increases and denial of credit to the government. This article argues that legal central bank independence (CBI) deters fiscal deficits predominantly in countries with rule of law and impartial contract enforcement, a free press and constraints on executive power. It further suggests that CBI may not affect fiscal deficits in a counter-cyclical fashion, but instead depending on the electoral calendar and government partisanship. The article also tests the novel hypotheses using new yearly data on legal CBI for seventy-eight countries from 1970 to 2007. The results show that CBI restrains deficits only in democracies, during non-election years and under left government tenures.
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofBritish journal of political science
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleCentral bank independence and fiscal policy : can the central bank restrain deficit spending?
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0007123415000058
dc.identifier.volume47
dc.identifier.startpage47
dc.identifier.endpage70
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record