Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCREMONA, Marise
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-06T13:55:48Z
dc.date.available2018-12-06T13:55:48Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationEuropean constitutional law review, 2018, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 231-259
dc.identifier.issn1574-0196
dc.identifier.issn1744-5515en
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/59997
dc.descriptionPublished online: 06 February 2018en
dc.description.abstractThis comment analyses the legal context and significance of the Opinion handed down by the Court of Justice on 16 May 2017 on the envisaged free trade agreement between the EU and Singapore. At the heart of the Opinion are questions over competence, in particular the scope of the post-Lisbon common commercial policy, but including also the extent to which trade agreements may encompass provisions on sustainable development, regulatory issues and investor-state dispute settlement. The Singapore agreement is an example of the EU’s current generation of ‘deep and comprehensive’ trade agreements that represent the core of EU trade policy, and the Court’s Opinion is thus important not only for the future of the Singapore Agreement itself, but for future trade agreements (including a possible future EU-UK agreement).
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean constitutional law review
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.titleShaping EU trade policy post-Lisbon : opinion 2/15 of 16 may 2017 : ECJ, 16 may 2017, opinion 2/15 free trade agreement with Singapore
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1574019617000402
dc.identifier.volume14
dc.identifier.startpage231
dc.identifier.endpage259
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record