Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBUTLER, Graham
dc.contributor.authorSADL, Urska
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-06T13:55:50Z
dc.date.available2018-12-06T13:55:50Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationEuropean law review, 2018, Vol. 43, No. 1, pp. 120-128
dc.identifier.issn0307-5400
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/60003
dc.description.abstractOn 11 June 2015, the President of the First Chamber of the Court of Justice of the EU (the Court) issued an order to delete Bogdan Chain v Atlanco Ltd (C-189/14) from the Registry. This comment and the reflection are thus not motivated by a judgment, but rather by the reasons why the Court after an oral hearing held in the presence of the parties and eight intervening Member States, and after hearing the Advocate General, did not deliver one. The comment examines the legal framework, as well as the detailed procedural rules and guidelines that govern the co-operation of national courts in the preliminary reference procedure. It highlights the fact that preliminary references can only work when the preliminaries of a reference-the culture of sincere co-operation and litigation, efficient communication, and flexible procedural rules-are in place.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSweet & Maxwellen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean law review
dc.subjectContributions
dc.subjectEU law
dc.subjectJudicial co-operation
dc.subjectMigrant workers
dc.subjectNational courts
dc.subjectReferences to European Court
dc.subjectSocial security
dc.subjectCourten
dc.subjectsystemen
dc.subjectJudgesen
dc.titleThe preliminaries of a reference
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.volume43
dc.identifier.startpage120
dc.identifier.endpage128
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record