Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBLANCHARD, Emily J.
dc.contributor.authorWU, Mark
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-17T12:12:33Z
dc.date.available2018-12-17T12:12:33Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.issn1028-3625
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/60212
dc.description.abstractArticle 6 of the SPS Agreement presents a series of interlinked obligations for importing and exporting countries of diseased agricultural products. The Russia – Pigs dispute raises the question of when an importing country is justified in imposing a ban on products from exporting countries unaffected by the disease, on the basis of the fact that the country is part of the same customs union as another country inflicted with the disease. This Article contends that four distinct classes of cross-border and cross-product externalities ought to play in an important role when assessing this question in the future. It discusses the possible roles to be played by bilateral, sequential, pass-through, and supply chain externalities in propagating the transmission of agricultural disease across borders through trade.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI RSCASen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2018/60en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Governance Programme-325en
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Global Economics]en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectExternalitiesen
dc.subjectDispute settlementen
dc.subjectSPSen
dc.subjectAfrican swine fluen
dc.subjectAgricultural diseaseen
dc.subject.otherTrade, investment and international cooperation
dc.subject.otherRegulation and economic policy
dc.subject.otherInstitutions and policy-making
dc.titleExternalities and agricultural import bans : evaluating regionalization measures in light of the Russia - Pigs disputeen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record