Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSPERLING, James
dc.contributor.authorWEBBER, Mark
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-25T14:12:26Z
dc.date.available2019-01-25T14:12:26Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationHugo MEIJER and Marco WYSS (eds), The handbook of European defence policies and armed forces, Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2018, Oxford scholarship online : political science module, pp. 888-914en
dc.identifier.isbn9780198790501
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/60597
dc.description.abstractIn the post-cold-war period, NATO’s mission has shifted from static territorial defence against a well-defined adversary to expeditionary missions against ill-defined adversaries along the entire conflict spectrum. We trace the evolution of NATO security strategies and the attendant changes in allied threat perception, purpose, and force structure, the range and kinds of military operations between 1990 and 2016, and military exercises undertaken after the Russian annexation of Crimea. We then assess allied contributions to those operations (burden- and risk-sharing) and the selective participation of allies in operations (risk-assuming and risk-shirking). A final substantive concern is the growing capabilities gap among the allies, its implications for future allied operations, and its consequences for the alliance. The conclusion addresses the key question facing the alliance: should NATO abandon expeditionary operations and return to static territorial defence consistent with the original intent of the North Atlantic Treaty?en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Global Governance Programme]en
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Europe in the World]en
dc.subjectInternational relationsen
dc.titleNATO operationsen
dc.typeContribution to booken
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/oso/9780198790501.003.0052


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record