dc.contributor.author | SARTOR, Giovanni | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-13T12:03:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-13T12:03:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | |
dc.identifier.citation | David DUARTE and Jorge Silva SAMPAIO (eds), Proportionality in law : an analytical perspective, Cham : Springer, 2018, pp. 121-136 | en |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9783319896465 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9783319896472 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/61065 | |
dc.description.abstract | This contribution explores the consistency in cases having opposite outcomes and different impacts on legally relevant values, both individual rights and social values. The link between outcomes’ impacts on values and factors influencing such impacts is also considered. On this basis a formal analysis of the connection between balancing assessments and factor-based case-rules is proposed. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.title | Consistency in balancing : from value assessments to factor-based rules | en |
dc.type | Contribution to book | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/978-3-319-89647-2_6 | |