| dc.contributor.author | RODIN, David | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-20T08:26:22Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-02-20T08:26:22Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2015 | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Ethics, 2015, Vol. 125, No. 3, pp. 674-695 | en |
| dc.identifier.issn | 0014-1704 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1539-297X | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/61204 | |
| dc.description | First Published: April 2015 | en |
| dc.description.abstract | Important moral dilemmas arise in the context of what I have called jus terminatio and Darrel Moellendorf has called jus ex bello- the norms governing the termination of war. I discuss three dilemmas, showing how they also illuminate proportionality and jus ad bellum. 1) morally accounting for new costs that arise during the course of a war; 2) two variants of the 'sunk costs dilemma' in which an agent is permitted to contribute to a project that is all things considered morally unjust, when that project is morally justified on a forward looking basis; and 3) the problem of moral hazard in peace negotiations. | en |
| dc.description.sponsorship | The research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) / ERC Grant Agreement No 340956 - IOW - The Individualisation of War: Reconfiguring the Ethics, Law, and Politics of Armed Conflict. | |
| dc.language.iso | en | en |
| dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/340956/EU | |
| dc.relation.ispartof | Ethics | en |
| dc.relation.ispartofseries | [IOW] | en |
| dc.title | The war trap : dilemmas of jus terminatio | en |
| dc.type | Article | en |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1086/679559 | |
| dc.identifier.volume | 125 | en |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 674 | en |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 695 | en |
| eui.subscribe.skip | true | |
| dc.identifier.issue | 3 | en |