Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorTESCHE, Tobias
dc.date.accessioned2019-05-17T06:40:20Z
dc.date.available2021-05-16T02:45:42Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJournal of common market studies, 2019, Vol. 57, No. 6, pp. 1211-1227en
dc.identifier.issn0021-9886
dc.identifier.issn1468-5965
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/62884
dc.descriptionPublished: 16 May 2019en
dc.description.abstractThis article shows that the troika institutions - the European Commission, the European Central Bank (ECB) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) - formed a technocratic consensus about the desirability of establishing national fiscal councils in the European Union (EU). Considerable disagreement existed, however, with regards to their design features. Each institution promoted a distinct mode of indirect governance by ranking national fiscal councils depending on their adopted governance model (agent, trustee or orchestrator). This persuasion through entrepreneurial benchmarking constitutes an important mechanism by which member states were nudged to adopt a distinct fiscal council model. Preference heterogeneity among the troika members ultimately prevented the spread of a one-size-fits-all fiscal council in the EU.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of common market studiesen
dc.relation.isreplacedbyhttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/62526
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.title'The troika is dead, long live the domestic troikas?' : the diffusion of national fiscal councils in the European Unionen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/jcms.12880
dc.identifier.volume57
dc.identifier.startpage1211
dc.identifier.endpage1227
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.embargo.terms2021-05-16


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record