Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDE SOUZA DIAS, Talita
dc.contributor.authorAKANDE, Dapo
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-10T10:34:05Z
dc.date.available2019-07-10T10:34:05Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/63568
dc.description.abstractA key reform that has the potential to make the international criminal justice project stronger,more efficient and more effective is the consideration of peace negotiations as an additional factor in the Prosecutor’s decision of whether or not to pursue an investigation or prosecution ‘in the interests of justice’, in accordance with Article 53(1)(c) and 2(c) of the Rome Statute. At present, this would require a revision of the Policy Papers issued on this question, in particular, the 2013 Policy Paper on Preliminary Examinations and the 2007 Policy Paper on the Interests of Justice. Significantly, such reform has the potential to prevent or alleviate, at least in part, some of the most pressing problems encountered by the ICC Office of the Prosecutor (OTP), namely, the lack of state cooperation, limited budget, and lengthy or complex proceedings.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThe research leading to these results has received funding from the European Research Council under the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP/2007-2013) / ERC Grant Agreement No 340956 - IOW - The Individualisation of War: Reconfiguring the Ethics, Law, and Politics of Armed Conflict.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/340956/EUen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIOWen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPolicy Briefsen
dc.relation.ispartofseries[2019]en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleWhen should the ICC prosecutor defer investigations or prosecutions in situations of active armed conflict in favor of peace negotiations?en
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record