Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHOEKMAN, Bernard M.
dc.contributor.authorMAVROIDIS, Petros C.
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-23T12:21:03Z
dc.date.available2019-07-23T12:21:03Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1028-3625
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/63666
dc.description.abstractIn December 2019 the WTO Appellate Body (AB) will cease to operate unless the United States stops blocking new appointments. The US argues the AB has exceeded its mandate and has indicated it wants to ensure that the AB performs the role originally assigned to it in 1995. This paper discusses the Uruguay round negotiating history with the view to establish what “going back to 1995” entails. It concludes that this should not be difficult assuming a willingness of the WTO membership to seriously consider the US concerns and acceptance by the US of a commitment by the membership to ensure that the AB operates consistently with its 1995 mandate.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI RSCASen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2019/56en
dc.relation.ispartofseriesGlobal Governance Programme-353en
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Global Economics]en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectDispute settlementen
dc.subjectAppellate Bodyen
dc.subjectWTOen
dc.subjectUruguay rounden
dc.subject.otherTrade, investment and international cooperation
dc.titleBurning down the house? : the Appellate Body in the centre of the WTO crisisen
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record