Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHADJ-ABDOU, Leila
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-28T09:51:51Z
dc.date.available2019-08-28T09:51:51Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationComparative migration studies, 2019, Vol. 7, [15], OnlineOnlyen
dc.identifier.issn2214-594X
dc.identifier.other15
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/63866
dc.descriptionPublished: 30 April 2019en
dc.description.abstractThis commentary is a reply to the article ‘Against immigrant integration’ by Willem Schinkel. It argues that rather than abandoning immigrant integration as a field of research, we have to continue to strengthen critical approaches. Immigrant integration has to be understood and analyzed as a governance technique, rendering differences purposeful for certain ends. In this way, categories such as class and race get into the picture instead of being omitted. It is also emphasized that we have to look beyond the nation state to truly unsettle common sense ideas about immigrant integration and the migrant ‘other’. These points are illustrated by discussing the ‘management’ of immigrant integration in cities in Europe.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSpringerOpen (part of Springer Nature)en
dc.relation.ispartofComparative migration studiesen
dc.relation.ispartofseries[Migration Policy Centre]en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectImmigrationen
dc.subjectEthno-cultural differencesen
dc.subjectIntegrationen
dc.subjectEuropeen
dc.subjectCitiesen
dc.titleImmigrant integration : the governance of ethno-cultural differenceen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s40878-019-0124-8
dc.identifier.volume7en
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*


Files associated with this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International