Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKOCHENOV, Dimitry
dc.contributor.authorBELAVUSAU, Uladzislau
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-10T13:23:15Z
dc.date.available2019-10-10T13:23:15Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn1725-6739
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/64525
dc.description.abstractThis paper provides a detailed critical analysis of the case of Coman, where the Court of Justice clarified that the meaning of the term ‘spouse’ in Directive 2004/38 was gender-neutral, opening up the door for same-sex marriage recognition for immigration purposes all around the EU, thus destroying the heteronormative misinterpretations of the clear language of the Directive practiced in a handful of Member States. The state of EU law after Coman is still far from perfect, however: we underline a line of important questions which remain open and which the Court will need to turn to in the near future to ensure that marriage equality in moves beyond mere proclamations in the whole territory of the Union.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherEuropean University Instituteen
dc.relation.ispartofseriesEUI LAWen
dc.relation.ispartofseries2019/03en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectComanen
dc.subjectMarriage equalityen
dc.subjectNon-discriminationen
dc.subjectSame-sex marriageen
dc.subjectEU lawen
dc.titleSame-sex spouses in the EU after Coman : more free movement, but what about marriage?en
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record