Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCRUMP, Laurien
dc.contributor.authorROMANO, Angela
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-07T10:58:03Z
dc.date.available2020-01-07T10:58:03Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationLaurien CRUMP and Susanna ERLANDSSON (eds), Margins for manoeuvre in Cold War Europe : the influence of smaller powers, Abingdon ; New York : Routledge, 2019, Routledge studies in modern European history, pp. 13-31en
dc.identifier.isbn9781138388376
dc.identifier.isbn9780429425592
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/65624
dc.description.abstractIn this chapter we argue that in a Cold War order largely dominated by the superpowers most European governments — both East and West — came to see multilateralism as an opportunity to either organise efforts at coordinating a position on international issues or to assert their individual interests vis-à-vis their leading superpower. Our analysis reveals on the strategies of small states to stretch their room for manoeuvre within military alliances and other forms of cooperation in Eastern and Western Europe simultaneously, with a focus on the concept of European security. The chapter deals with small powers' actions in four different multilateral contexts: Warsaw Pact, the EC/EPC, NATO and the overarching context of the European security conference (CSCE). It challenges the conventional bipolar Cold War paradigm that sees European security as shaped by the superpowers only, and proves that small powers had an explicit stake and active role in defining what security meant in the European continent.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.titleChallenging the superpower straitjacket (1965–1975) : multilateralism as an instrument of smaller powersen
dc.typeContribution to booken
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record