Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorZSCHIRNT, Eva
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-13T12:00:03Z
dc.date.available2020-01-13T12:00:03Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationSwiss journal of sociology, 2019, Vol.45, No. 2, pp. 143-160en
dc.identifier.issn2297-8348
dc.identifier.issn0379-3664
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/65711
dc.descriptionAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0)en
dc.descriptionPublished online: 17 Aug 2019en
dc.description.abstractCorrespondence tests on discrimination usually report only whether an applicant was invited for a job interview or not. Yet, data from a field experiment in Switzerland demonstrate that candidates with the same outcome are not necessarily treated equally. The paper complements correspondence test results with information on the time elapsed until candidates were contacted, as well as qualitative differences in invitation or rejection emails.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherDe Gruyteren
dc.relation.ispartofSwiss journal of sociologyen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/*
dc.titleEqual outcomes, but different treatment : subtle discrimination in email responses from a correspondence test in Switzerlanden
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.2478/sjs-2019-0007 2297-8348
dc.identifier.volume45en
dc.identifier.startpage143en
dc.identifier.endpage160en
dc.identifier.issue2en
dc.rights.licenseAttribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International*
dc.twittertrueen


Files associated with this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International