The ideological shadow of authoritarianism
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
0010-4140; 1552-3829
Issue Date
Type of Publication
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Comparative political studies, 2020, Vol 53, No. 12, pp. 1957-1991
Cite
DINAS, Elias, NORTHMORE-BALL, Ksenia, The ideological shadow of authoritarianism, Comparative political studies, 2020, Vol 53, No. 12, pp. 1957-1991 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/66032
Abstract
How do the labels left and right take on meaning in new democracies? Existing explanations point to the universality of the left-right scheme or, reversely, emphasize regionally dominant social cleavages. We propose an alternative legacy-focused theory based on two observations: Dictatorships are not ideologically neutral and are negatively evaluated by most citizens and elites after democratization. These premises lead us to expect that when the authoritarian regime is associated with the left (right), the citizens of a new democracy will display an antileft (antiright) bias in their left-right self-identification. We test this hypothesis across Latin American and European new democracies. We find significant bias, which in the case of new democracies following left-wing regimes is concealed due to intercohort heterogeneity. Although older cohorts denote a positive bias, cohorts born after Stalin's era denote negative bias against the left. Consistent with our expectations, repression exacerbates this bias whereas indoctrination mitigates it. Finally, we look at how these biases apply to party preferences. The findings have important implications for understanding authoritarian legacies and party system development in new democracies.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
First published online: July 7, 2019
External Links
Publisher
Version
Research Projects
Sponsorship and Funder Information
John Fell Fund, University of Oxford
British Academy
British Academy