Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKANTNER, Cathleen
dc.date.accessioned2007-01-22T15:24:21Z
dc.date.available2007-01-22T15:24:21Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Social Theory, 2006, 9, 4, 501-523en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/6626
dc.description.abstractAgainst the common view that a European identity is a functional precondition for legitimate EU governance, this article argues that conceptual weaknesses of the term ‘collective identity’ have led to a confusion of several analytic dimensions of ‘identity’ and to an overestimation of strong forms of collective identity. Insights provided by analytic philosophy will be introduced in order to redefine and differentiate ‘collective identity’. The ways in which people refer to themselves as members of we-groups will be outlined and illustrated in order to contribute to an innovative model of the problem and therefore the policy-related formation of collective identities. The article concludes that a strong European identity is not a functional precondition for legitimate everyday democratic governance in the EU. Only in extraordinary situations and in order to institutionalize integration in ethically sensitive policy fields is it necessary that EU citizens discursively agree on an ethical self-understanding of their way of lifeen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.titleCollective Identity as Shared Ethical Self-Understanding: The Case of the Emerging European Identityen
dc.typeArticleen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record