Rationale, potential and pitfalls of green securitization

dc.contributor.author	PETIT, Christy Ann
dc.contributor.author	SCHLOSSER, Pierre
dc.date.accessioned	2020-05-13T15:41:20Z
dc.date.available	2020-05-13T15:41:20Z
dc.date.issued	2020
dc.identifier.issn	1028-3625
dc.identifier.uri	https://hdl.handle.net/1814/67018
dc.description.abstract	The purpose of this paper is to take stock of green securitization’s rationale, potential and pitfalls. It does so by first describing what green securitization is, and, identifying the diversity of asset-backed securities’ types used. The specificities of green securitization are illustrated with examples and two deeper case studies. A critical assessment on benefits, risks, costs and limitations of green securitization in fostering green finance is then provided. Before concluding, the paper also engages with public incentives and general public support measures that could sustain the growth of green securitization.	en
dc.format.mimetype	application/pdf	en
dc.language.iso	en	en
dc.publisher	European University Institute	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	EUI RSCAS	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	2020/35	en
dc.relation.ispartofseries	Florence School of Regulation	en
dc.rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess	en
dc.rights.uri	http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/	*
dc.subject	Securitization	en
dc.subject	Structured finance	en
dc.subject	Green finance	en
dc.title	Rationale, potential and pitfalls of green securitization	en
dc.type	Working Paper	en
dc.rights.license	Attribution 4.0 International	*

Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International