Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNÄSSTRÖM, Sofia
dc.date.accessioned2020-07-23T13:28:01Z
dc.date.available2020-07-23T13:28:01Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.citationEuropean journal of political theory, 2006, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 321-342en
dc.identifier.issn1474-8851
dc.identifier.issn1741-2730
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/67832
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 1 July 2006en
dc.description.abstractRepresentative democracy is often assessed from the standpoint of direct democracy. Recently, however, many theorists have come to argue that representation forms a democratic model in its own right. The most powerful claim in this direction is to be found within two quite different strands of thinking: the aesthetic theory of Frank Ankersmit and the savage theory of Claude Lefort. In this article, I show that while Ankersmit and Lefort converge in their critique of direct rule, they provide us with two distinct models of democracy. Aesthetic democracy, I argue, in the end falls short as a democratic recuperation of representation. It reduces representation to delegation. Savage democracy proves more fruitful in this respect. It offers a representative view of politics without committing itself to the premises associated with political delegation.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean journal of political theoryen
dc.subjectActionen
dc.subjectAestheticsen
dc.subjectConflicten
dc.subjectDelegationen
dc.subjectDemocracyen
dc.subjectElectionen
dc.subjectRepresentationen
dc.subjectTotalitarianismen
dc.titleRepresentative democracy as tautology : Ankersmit and Lefort on representationen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1474885106064664
dc.identifier.volume5en
dc.identifier.startpage321en
dc.identifier.endpage342en
dc.identifier.issue3en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record