Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBHAT, Prashanth
dc.contributor.authorKLEIN, Ofra
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-28T09:27:53Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationGwen BOUVIER and Judith E. ROSENBAUM (eds), Twitter, the public sphere, and the chaos of online deliberation, Cham : Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, pp. 151-172en
dc.identifier.isbn9783030414214
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/67951
dc.description.abstractDog whistling, a form of symbolic communication through seemingly innocuous terms is a common practice for members of far-right movements. This chapter examines how dog whistling was used on Twitter during the 2016 presidential election through a virtual ethnographic approach. Dog whistling serves to circumvent censorship by automated moderation, and adapts historical markers of the far-right as well as symbols used in other media to work within Twitter’s affordances. Thus, Twitter is employed as a channel to spread hate and signal belonging among far-right communities. In doing so, creative use is made of the platform’s technology, in the face of the site’s moderation techniques, to convey white supremacist ideas to a broader audience while staying under the radar of detection.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherPalgrave Macmillanen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleCovert hate speech : white nationalists and dog whistle communication on Twitteren
dc.typeContribution to booken
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/978-3-030-41421-4_7
dc.embargo.terms2022-07-30
dc.date.embargo2022-07-30


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record