dc.contributor.author | BHAT, Prashanth | |
dc.contributor.author | KLEIN, Ofra | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-28T09:27:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Gwen BOUVIER and Judith E. ROSENBAUM (eds), Twitter, the public sphere, and the chaos of online deliberation, Cham : Palgrave Macmillan, 2020, pp. 151-172 | en |
dc.identifier.isbn | 9783030414214 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1814/67951 | |
dc.description.abstract | Dog whistling, a form of symbolic communication through seemingly innocuous terms is a common practice for members of far-right movements. This chapter examines how dog whistling was used on Twitter during the 2016 presidential election through a virtual ethnographic approach. Dog whistling serves to circumvent censorship by automated moderation, and adapts historical markers of the far-right as well as symbols used in other media to work within Twitter’s affordances. Thus, Twitter is employed as a channel to spread hate and signal belonging among far-right communities. In doing so, creative use is made of the platform’s technology, in the face of the site’s moderation techniques, to convey white supremacist ideas to a broader audience while staying under the radar of detection. | en |
dc.language.iso | en | en |
dc.publisher | Palgrave Macmillan | en |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en |
dc.title | Covert hate speech : white nationalists and dog whistle communication on Twitter | en |
dc.type | Contribution to book | en |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/978-3-030-41421-4_7 | |
dc.embargo.terms | 2022-07-30 | |
dc.date.embargo | 2022-07-30 | |