Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPAGANO, Mario
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-09T14:06:14Z
dc.date.available2020-09-09T14:06:14Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationDiritto e processo : derecho y proceso - right & remedies, 2019, pp. 311-360en
dc.identifier.issn1722-1110
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/68121
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 22 August 2020en
dc.description.abstractThis article focuses on the judicial means used by environmental non-governmental organisations (ENGOs) to overcome the Plaumann test, the particularly narrow scrutiny used by the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) to grant direct access in actions for annulment to private applicants. In spite of the major changes that have occurred in the EU legal order in the last decades (e.g. the adhesion of the EU to the Aarhus Convention, the adoption of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights and the entry into force of the Lisbon Treaty), the Court has never amended its test. Therefore, the ultimate goal of this contribution is to highlight the arguments that ENGOs have generally used to mobilise to CJEU with regard to Plaumann and to reflect on how these arguments have evolved on the basis of an equally evolving EU legal system.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversità degli Studi di Perugiaen
dc.relation.ispartofDiritto e processo : derecho y proceso - right & remediesen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleOvercoming Plaumann in EU environmental litigation : an analysis of NGOs legal arguments in actions for annulmenten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.startpage311en
dc.identifier.endpage360en


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record