Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDUPUY, Pierre-Marie
dc.date.accessioned2007-05-22T14:35:07Z
dc.date.available2007-05-22T14:35:07Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationEuropean journal of legal studies, 2007, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 25-41en
dc.identifier.issn1973-2937
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/6839
dc.descriptionIssue on 'Cross-perspectives'en
dc.descriptionPublished online: 01 September 2007en
dc.description.abstractThe fragmentation of international law is not proven, even if the dangers of its realisation are, according to some commentators, certain; but this idea already constitutes a common point, a way of thinking, within academic theory, where it has become a phenomenon in itself. It is thus appropriate to restate the reasons for, and even more so to examine the object of, the concept of a legal order as it applies to international law. The stakes of the debate on the unity or fragmentation of international law are even higher as they involve not only legal, but also political, considerations. However, the core of the problem of unity and fragmentation, which is primarily technical, is well-defined by the International Law Commission’s recent study of the topic, even if its assessment is definitively based on the invocation of well-established principles.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isofren
dc.publisherEuropean University Instituteen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean journal of legal studiesen
dc.relation.urihttps://ejls.eui.eu/en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectInternational lawen
dc.titleA Doctrinal Debate in the Globalisation Era: on the “Fragmentation” of International Lawen
dc.title.alternativeUn débat doctrinal a l’ere de la globalisation: Sur la fragmentation du droit international
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.volume1
dc.identifier.startpage25
dc.identifier.endpage41
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1


Files associated with this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record