Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNICKEL, James
dc.date.accessioned2007-05-23T15:39:21Z
dc.date.available2007-05-23T15:39:21Z
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Legal Studies, 2007, 1, 1en
dc.identifier.issn1973-2937
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/6848
dc.description.abstractThis essay discusses the grounds for due process rights (DPRs) and the permissibil¬ity of suspending them during terrorist and other emergencies. The two topics are profitably treated together because DPRs—along with freedoms of movement, expression, and political participation—are often suspended or restricted when national emergencies occur. Although I present a strong case for DPRs as human rights, this justification does not settle their priority during emergency situations. That issue raises additional questions, and I discuss some of them. The overall thrust of the essay is to defend the importance of respecting DPRs during troubled times. The penultimate section discusses DPRs in the context of the “war on terror” in the United States.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofEuropean journal of legal studiesen
dc.relation.urihttps://ejls.eui.eu/
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.subjectComparative Lawen
dc.titleDue Process Rights and Terrorist Emergenciesen
dc.title.alternativeDireito a um Processo Equitativo e Emergencias Terroristas
dc.typeArticleen
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
eui.subscribe.skiptrue


Files associated with this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record