Open Access
The core of constitutionalism : understanding constitutional unamendability
Loading...
Files
Marciniak_2020_LAW.pdf (4.72 MB)
Embargoed till 2024
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Florence : European University Institute, 2020
EUI; LAW; PhD Thesis
Cite
MARCINIAK, Bartosz Krzysztof, The core of constitutionalism : understanding constitutional unamendability, Florence : European University Institute, 2020, EUI, LAW, PhD Thesis - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/68841
Abstract
We have been warned, by no one less than Plato: unless political power and philosophy are conjoined, the polis nor humanity itself will be free from trouble. This dissertation seeks to provide an argument of how this warning could be heeded in the modern polis, i.e. the democratic constitutional state. Through reconstruction of jurisprudence of constitutional and supreme courts regarding the (un)constitutionality of constitutional amendments and constitutional laws, this dissertation proposes a sketch of an encompassing theory that clarifies what I call the core of constitutionalism. Dignity is the key concept within this theory. Without invoking natural law conceptions, the theory proposed herein – drawing on Habermas’s discourse theory, Dworkin’s conception of dignity and Murphy’s conception of constitutional coherence – rethinks the idea of constituent power, which, I argue taking as the basis the aforementioned judicial practice, is inherently circumscribed. Once it has been exercised, it becomes extinguished and transformed in the core of constitutionalism that is composed of trias: the principle of democracy, the principle of the rule of law, and the principle of fundamental (basic) rights. The core sets forth a number of criteria on the basis of which courts can reasonably come to the above judgements. In turn, the judgements analysed cast new light on the evolution and endurance of constitutional democracies. A second aim of this dissertation is to argue that the phenomenon of unconstitutional constitutional amendments can never be fully understood from the perspective of a single field of study such as constitutional theory. Constitutional unamendability is a phenomenon that should be examined concomitantly from perspective of philosophy, sociology, legal and constitutional theory as well as political theology. By establishing a conceptual link between these domains of studies, focused on the phenomenon of constitutional (un)amendability, one day down the line scholars could be ready to speak, with mutual understanding, on issues with which modern constitutional democracies struggle.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
Defence date: 4 November 2020
Examining Board: Professor Giovanni Sartor (European University Institute); Professor Gábor Halmai (European University Institute); Professor Bernardus Smulders (European Commission); Professor Giorgio Bongiovanni (University of Bologna)
Examining Board: Professor Giovanni Sartor (European University Institute); Professor Gábor Halmai (European University Institute); Professor Bernardus Smulders (European Commission); Professor Giorgio Bongiovanni (University of Bologna)