Date: 2020
Type: Working Paper
Fishy SPS measures? : the WTO’s Korea-radionuclides dispute
Working Paper, EUI RSCAS, 2020/81, Global Governance Programme-421, [Global Economics]
BREWSTER, Rachel, FISCHER, Carolyn, Fishy SPS measures? : the WTO’s Korea-radionuclides dispute, EUI RSCAS, 2020/81, Global Governance Programme-421, [Global Economics] - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/69020
Retrieved from Cadmus, EUI Research Repository
The Korea-Radionuclides case addresses Korean SPS measures imposed on Japanese fishery products after the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant meltdown in 2011. Japan challenged these measures as more restrictive than necessary under the SPS Agreement. The panel agreed with Japan, but this ruling was largely reversed by the Appellate Body. Korea’s victory at the Appellate Body was based on procedure. The panel accepted Korea’s appropriate level of protection (ALOP), which included both quantitative and qualitative elements. However, the Appellate Body found that the panel only addressed the quantitative aspect of Korea’s ALOP and reversed on that basis. The Appellate Body’s ruling did not affirmatively find that Korea’s SPS measures were legal under WTO rules. Instead, the Appellate Body found that panel had not sufficiently addressed Korea’s arguments and, thereby, the panel could not determine that the SPS measures were more restrictive than necessary. The case highlights the need for the Appellate Body to be able to conduct its own factual analysis, a power it could be given if the dispute settlement system is reformed. Without independent fact-finding power, the Appellate Body cannot correct panels’ mistakes, and respondents can prevail based on panel error.
Cadmus permanent link: https://hdl.handle.net/1814/69020
ISSN: 1028-3625
Series/Number: EUI RSCAS; 2020/81; Global Governance Programme-421; [Global Economics]
Publisher: European University Institute
Other topic(s): Trade Investment International Cooperation