Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMILAZZO, Eleonora
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-27T14:19:48Z
dc.date.available2020-11-27T14:19:48Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationGlobal justice : theory practice rhetoric, 2020, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 189-218en
dc.identifier.issn1835-6842
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/69023
dc.descriptionPublished online: 19 November 2020en
dc.description.abstractThe concept of solidarity has been receiving growing attention from scholars in a wide range of disciplines. While this trend coincides with widespread unsuccessful attempts to achieve solidarity in the real world, the failure of solidarity as such remains a relatively unexplored topic. In the case of the so-called European Union (EU) refugee crisis, the fact that EU member states failed to fulfil their commitment to solidarity is now regarded as established wisdom. But as we try to come to terms with failing solidarity in the EU we are faced with a number of important questions: are all instances of failing solidarity equally morally reprehensible? Are some motivations for resorting to unsolidaristic measures more valid than others? What claims have an effective countervailing force against the commitment to act in solidarity?en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherThe Global Justice Networken
dc.relation.ispartofGlobal justice : theory practice rhetoricen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectSolidarityen
dc.subjectNon-complianceen
dc.subjectJustificationen
dc.subjectAsylumen
dc.subjectEuropean Unionen
dc.titleFailing solidarity : justified or excused? : assessing EU member states’ arguments in defence of the failure to share responsibility for refugee protectionen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.21248/gjn.12.02.209
dc.identifier.volume12en
dc.identifier.startpage189en
dc.identifier.endpage218en
dc.identifier.issue2en


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record