Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEVANS, Matthew
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-14T09:55:45Z
dc.date.available2021-01-14T09:55:45Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationEuropean journal of legal studies, 2021, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 187-222en
dc.identifier.issn1973-2937
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/69519
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 09 June 2021
dc.description.abstractThis article reflects upon critical theory, focusing especially on critical legal theory, particularly in relation to human rights. Positing that much critical theory is in fact uncritical, the article argues that critical theory is frequently deployed in such a way as to contradict its supposed purposes of challenging the prevailing order, orthodoxy and injustice, and guiding radical change. It is argued that in deploying critical (legal) theory there is a danger of producing bullshit, which scholars should be mindful of and should seek to avoid. Finally, the article suggests moving towards postdisciplinarity and to greater integration of critique with theory and practice as possible resolutions to the dilemmas and contradictions exposed by drawing attention to bullshit and uncritical critical (legal) theory.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.urihttps://ejls.eui.eu/en
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.subjectCritical theory
dc.subjectHuman rights
dc.subjectCritical legal theory
dc.subjectPostdisciplinarity
dc.subjectFoucault
dc.titleYou cannot eat critique : on uncritical critical (legal) theory and the poverty of bullshiten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.2924/EJLS.2019.036
dc.identifier.volume13en
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1en
dc.twitterTRUE


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record