Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGARZIA, Diego
dc.contributor.authorTRECHSEL, Alexander H.
dc.contributor.authorDE ANGELIS, Andrea
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-19T13:33:21Z
dc.date.available2021-01-19T13:33:21Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationPolitical communication, 2017, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 424-443en
dc.identifier.issn1058-4609
dc.identifier.issn1091-7675
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/69603
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 15 February 2017en
dc.description.abstractVoting Advice Applications (VAAs) help users casting a vote by offering an explicit ranking of viable options. The wide amount of readily available information provided by VAAs to users has been shown to contribute to reducing the transactional costs involved in gathering relevant political information. Available evidence also supports the idea that VAA users are more likely to cast a ballot in elections as a result. The extent to which electoral participation is caused by using a VAA, however, remains unclear. Against this background, we reassess the mobilizing effect of VAAs by means of a multi-method approach. Our cross-sectional analysis of 12 national election study data sets provides further support to the idea that VAA usage increases users’ chances of casting a ballot in elections as compared to non-users. This conclusion is strengthened by the results of a randomized field experiment conducted in the context of the 2013 Italian parliamentary election.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherRoutledgeen
dc.relation.ispartofPolitical communicationen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleVoting advice applications and electoral participation : a multi-method studyen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/10584609.2016.1267053
dc.identifier.volume34en
dc.identifier.startpage424en
dc.identifier.endpage443en
dc.identifier.issue3en


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record