Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHESSELINK, Martijn Willem
dc.date.accessioned2021-01-20T15:43:12Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationRatio juris, 2020, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp. 196-222en
dc.identifier.issn0952-1917
dc.identifier.issn1467-9337
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/69629
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 12 July 2020en
dc.description.abstractThis paper defends a right to the justification of contract, with reciprocal and general reasons, and explores its main implications for the law of contract and its theory. It argues that the leading essentialist and other monist contract theories, offering blueprints for an ideal contract law based on the alleged ultimate value or essential characteristic of contract law, cannot justify the basic structure of contract law. Instead, it argues, a critical discourse theory of contract can contribute to the realisation of the right to justification of contract by exposing patterns of contractual injustice, in particular exploitation and domination by contract, that contract law can and should prevent.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherWileyen
dc.relation.ispartofRatio jurisen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleThe right to justification of contracten
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/raju.12287
dc.identifier.volume33en
dc.identifier.startpage196en
dc.identifier.endpage222en
dc.identifier.issue2en
dc.embargo.terms2022-07-12
dc.date.embargo2022-07-12


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record