Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNICOLAÏDIS, Kalypso
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-16T14:29:29Z
dc.date.available2021-02-16T14:29:29Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationJournal of European public policy, 2020, Vol. 27, No. 9, pp. 1307-1328en
dc.identifier.issn1466-4429
dc.identifier.issn1350-1763
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/69953
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 31 July 2020en
dc.description.abstractThis article explores the ways cosmopolitanism, federalism and constitutionalism have evolved in Europe from core philosophical concepts to political programmes, and ultimately ‘ideological benchmarks’ with highly contested meanings. I identify three alternative intellectual strategies for their appropriation, and through them the appropriation of ‘Kant’s mantle’, which both reflect and affect the EU public sphere. In the process, I ask how they can serve as resources conceptually to ground a third way for Europe. First, essentialist strategies appeal to affinities with the essence of these traditions, an essence anterior to or distinct from the particular variant of the ‘state writ large’ with which they might be identified in the public and scholarly imagination. Second, composite strategies employ various modifiers to deflect criticism. Thirdly, pollination strategies retain the flavor and questions raised by the three isms without necessarily coopting their labels.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of European public policyen
dc.titleKant’s mantle : cosmopolitanism, federalism and constitutionalism as European ideologiesen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/13501763.2020.1786596
dc.identifier.volume27en
dc.identifier.startpage1307en
dc.identifier.endpage1328en
dc.identifier.issue9en


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record