Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRIVERET, Régis
dc.contributor.authorROTOLO, Antonino
dc.contributor.authorSARTOR, Giovanni
dc.date.accessioned2021-03-01T13:32:24Z
dc.date.available2021-03-01T13:32:24Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationJournal of applied logics, 2019, Vol. 6, No. 5, pp. 903-939en
dc.identifier.issn2055-3706
dc.identifier.issn2055-3714
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/70278
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 31 August 2019en
dc.description.abstractA modular rule-based argumentation system is proposed to represent and reason upon conditional norms featuring obligations, prohibitions, and (strong or weak) permissions. The approach is based on common constructs in computational models of argument: rule-based arguments, argumentation graphs, argument labelling semantics and statement labelling semantics. Deontic reasoning patterns are captured with defeasible rule schemata to the greatest extent, towards the reification of doctrinal pieces. We show then that bivalent statement labelling s can fall short to address normative completeness, and for this reason, we propose to use trivalent labelling semantics. Given an argumentation graph, deontic statuses can be computed efficiently. The system is illustrated with a scenario featuring a violation and a contrary-to-duty obligation.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherCollege Publicationsen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of applied logicsen
dc.titleA deontic argumentation framework towards doctrine reificationen
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.volume6
dc.identifier.startpage903
dc.identifier.endpage939
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue5


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record