| dc.description.abstract | The European economic crisis has stimulated a great deal of research linking contextual macroeconomic conditions and political outputs, as conventional and unconventional political participation. Nevertheless, such research has often treated forms of political participation as independent from each other, overlooking how citizens can choose from combinations of political actions to influence politics in contexts with varying levels of macroeconomic performance. This article, instead, focuses on two common forms of participation - voting and protesting - and studies whether engagement in repertoires of participation - the disengaged (abstaining and not protesting), the duty-based (voting and not protesting), the protest (abstaining and protesting), and the all-round (voting and protesting) repertoires - varies according to countries' macroeconomic conditions in Europe in 30 countries over time. This article also considers that the effect of macroeconomic conditions on repertoires of participation might depend on citizens' socioeconomic resources - such as education, employment status, and income - with consequences for participation gaps or inequalities. Using multilevel models and data from seven rounds of the European Social Survey, this article shows that in contexts where macroeconomic conditions are worse, the probability of engaging in the protest repertoire increases, while the probability of engaging in the other three repertoires does not depend on the economy. In addition, the article finds that participation gaps narrow in the disengaged and duty-based repertoires in contexts with poorer macroeconomic performance, while the gaps in the protest and all-round repertoires do not change across contexts with different economic conditions. | en |