Open Access
Tribal ‘sulh’ and the politics of persuasion in volatile southern Syria
Loading...
Files
QM-02-21-370-EN-N.pdf (1.6 MB)
Full-text in Open Access
License
Attribution 4.0 International
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISSN
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
Middle East Directions (MED); 2021/04; Wartime and Post-Conflict in Syria
Cite
AL-JABASSINI, Abdullah, EZZI, Mazen, Tribal ‘sulh’ and the politics of persuasion in volatile southern Syria, Middle East Directions (MED), 2021/04, Wartime and Post-Conflict in Syria - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/70657
Abstract
Over the last few years, increasing political and criminal violence has dominated narratives emerging from Daraa and Sweida governorates in southern Syria. In their own localities, however, local notables have not been mere bystanders. They have made use of tribal sulh – a traditional conflict-resolution mechanism – to adjudicate disputes and contribute to maintaining some degree of normality and order. Drawing on original data derived from interviews with civilians, local notables and senior leaders of armed groups, together with rare access to the backstage of various intra- and inter-community sulh initiatives, we investigate the conditions under which local notables have succeeded or failed to utilise sulh and reduce the risk of intra-community violence in Daraa and Sweida. We demonstrate how domestic, regional and international actors have interfered to create, support or spoil the sulh process that took place between Daraa and Sweida over the course of 2020 in pursuit of their interests.