Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBIASILLO, Roberta
dc.contributor.authorDA SILVA, Claiton M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-07T08:15:47Z
dc.date.available2021-04-07T08:15:47Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationComparative studies in society and history, 2021, Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 366-339en
dc.identifier.issn0010-4175
dc.identifier.issn1475-2999
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/70735
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 25 March 2021en
dc.description.abstractThis article analyzes the role of soil in the making of authoritarian regimes and illustrates twentieth-century practices and discourses related to fertility across the globe. It compares two different approaches to and understandings of soil fertility: the first emerged in North Libya under Italian Fascist rule (1922–1943), the second in Central Brazil during the civil-military dictatorship (1964–1985). We compare two soil-forming processes that changed physical and chemical properties of the original matter and were embedded within specific ideologies of modernization. In both cases, state agendas of agrarian production played a paramount role not only in socioeconomic projects but also as an instrument to suppress opposition. Technocratic and political aspects of building and maintaining fertility were interwoven, although in different patterns in the two countries. We show how the rejuvenation of land bled into the regeneration of communities through processes that anchored the self-definition and development of these authoritarian regimes, and argue that attempts at landscape transformations through agricultural activity and strategies of fertilization are inescapable features of dictatorships. In so doing, we elaborate the concept of “authoritarian soil.” The juxtaposition of these non-synchronous cases reveals how agricultural modernization developed throughout the twentieth century. Our study is rooted in environmental history and contributes to the ongoing dialogue between that field and science and technology studies. Its cross-temporal, comparative methodology draws upon sources and historiographical debates in English, Italian, and Portuguese.en
dc.description.sponsorshipThis article was published Open Access with the support from the EUI Library through the CRUI - CUP Transformative Agreement (2020-2022)
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofComparative studies in society and historyen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.titleThe very grounds underlying twentieth-century authoritarian regimes : building soil fertility in Italian Libya and the Brazilian Cerradoen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S0010417521000086
dc.identifier.volume63en
dc.identifier.startpage366en
dc.identifier.endpage339en
dc.identifier.issue2en
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International