Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDINAS, Elias
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-13T12:08:42Z
dc.date.available2021-04-13T12:08:42Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationKevin FEATHERSTONE and Dimitri A. SOTIROPOULOS (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Modern Greek Politics, Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2020, Oxford handbooks, pp. 203-218en
dc.identifier.isbn9780198825104
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/70842
dc.description.abstractAs new democracies consolidate, so do their accompanying party systems. A key factor contributing to this process is the establishment of rigid electoral laws that set the rules of the game. With seven reforms since its inauguration in 1974, the Greek electoral system has been an exception to this rule. Although change has been sometimes incremental and other times short lived, it has kept the electoral system in the political agenda. In this article I review the trajectory of the electoral law in Greece and look at the way the discussion over electoral reform developed along the process of party-system maturation. In so doing, I try to shed light on what seems to be an interesting paradox: the electoral system in Greece appeared most robust exactly in the same period in which the party system was most volatile, amidst the debt crisis. The political turmoil which the crisis generated seems to have shaped Greek politics and party competition in many aspects apart from the otherwise fluid electoral system.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.titleThe electoral systemen
dc.typeContribution to booken
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198825104.013.13


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record