Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBEKISZ, Hubert
dc.date.accessioned2021-04-27T08:31:14Z
dc.date.available2021-04-27T08:31:14Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationJournal of European competition law & practice, 2021, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 217–235en
dc.identifier.issn2041-7764
dc.identifier.issn2041-7772
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/70938
dc.descriptionPublished online on 16 March 2021en
dc.description.abstractThis article raises a research question of when intra-platform algorithmic pricing results in an anticompetitive agreement or concerted practice in the meaning of Article 101 of the Treaty on the functioning of the European Union (TFEU). The taken approach is a combination of an overview of existing types of algorithmic pricing and the case study on the business model of Uber. Selection of Uber is motivated by its great significance on the online platforms’ market. In 2015, Uber has been valued $51 billion and was the only platform next to Facebook to exceed $50 billion threshold.1 Many platforms therefore follow Uber’s business model and the remarks explicitly made on the example of Uber remain relevant to many other Uber-like apps.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOxford University Pressen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of European competition law & practiceen
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.titleWhen does algorithmic pricing result in an intra-platform anticompetitive agreement or concerted practice? : the case of Uber in the framework of EU competition lawen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jeclap/lpab017
dc.identifier.volume12en
dc.identifier.startpage217en
dc.identifier.endpage235en
dc.identifier.issue3en


Files associated with this item

Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record