Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMIZON, Grayham E.
dc.date.accessioned2021-05-21T10:03:17Z
dc.date.available2021-05-21T10:03:17Z
dc.date.issued1995
dc.identifier.citationJournal of econometrics, 1995, Vol. 69, No. 1, pp. 267-288en
dc.identifier.issn0304-4076
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/71327
dc.descriptionFirst published online: 07 April 2000en
dc.description.abstractThough the practice of 'correcting for residual autocorrelation' has long been critized, it is still commonly advocated and followed. A simple example shows that even when a linear regression model has first-order autoregressive errors, it is possible for autoregressive least squares estimation (e.g., Cochrane-Orcutt) to yield inconsistent estimates. This dramatically illustrates that 'autocorrelation correction' is invalid in general, and cannot be justified on the grounds of 'robustifying' estimation against the presence of residual serial correlation, Invalid common factors in I(1) systems also have adverse effects on inference. A 'general-to-specific modelling strategy applied to the observed modelled variables avoids these difficulties.en
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of econometricsen
dc.relation.isbasedonhttp://hdl.handle.net/1814/478
dc.titleA simple message for autocorrelation correctors : don't
dc.typeArticle
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/0304-4076(94)01671-L
dc.identifier.volume69
dc.identifier.startpage267
dc.identifier.endpage288
eui.subscribe.skiptrue
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.description.versionThe article is a published version of EUI ECO WP; 1993/37


Files associated with this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record