Democratic-theory and individual autonomy : an interpretation of Schumpeter doctrine of democracy
License
Cadmus Permanent Link
Full-text via DOI
ISBN
ISSN
0304-4130
Issue Date
Type of Publication
Keyword(s)
LC Subject Heading
Other Topic(s)
EUI Research Cluster(s)
Initial version
Published version
Succeeding version
Preceding version
Published version part
Earlier different version
Initial format
Author(s)
Citation
European journal of political research, 1993, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 121-143
Cite
SANTORO, Emilio, Democratic-theory and individual autonomy : an interpretation of Schumpeter doctrine of democracy, European journal of political research, 1993, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 121-143 - https://hdl.handle.net/1814/71342
Abstract
Schumpeter argued that the norms of what he called the 'classical' theory were unrealisable within modern societies and offered what he believed to be a more realistic alternative. However, his critics accuse him of confusing 'is' with 'ought'. This paper seeks to save him from this criticism. It shows that Schumpeter's attack on the classical model rested on a correct appraisal of the constraints on individual autonomous action within modern societies. Unlike the 'competitive theory' of Downs and others, Schumpeter's own alternative cannot be treated as a naive apologia for contemporary parliametary party democracy. He was well aware that such systems easily degenerate into oligopolies. Indeed he welcomed this development, viewing the party elections as means for moulding rather than responding to the people's will. Nevertheless, a series of procedural norms underlay his theory which are elucidated with reference to Wittgenstein's account of language.
Table of Contents
Additional Information
First published: February 1993