Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorYAKUSHENKO, Olga
dc.date.accessioned2021-06-14T15:39:07Z
dc.date.available2021-06-14T15:39:07Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationJournal of art historiography, 2016, Vol. 14, OnlineOnlyen
dc.identifier.issn2042-4752
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/71644
dc.descriptionFirst published online: June 2016en
dc.description.abstractHistorical narratives are never objective, and they all have a certain ideology with an implicit (or even explicit) idea lying behind them. Art history narratives are both political and performative: they shape our perception of the phenomenon called ‘art’ as a succession of styles, artists and masterpieces. The past of art is constantly recreated and reinvented from the present of an art historian. Within the field of art history, the case of the history of architecture is, probably, the most complicated because architecture is a public phenomenon par excellence, and its implementation and interpretation are often socially and politically engaged.en
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherUniversity of Birminghamen
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of art historiographyen
dc.relation.isreplacedbyhttps://hdl.handle.net/1814/71643
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.titleAnatole Kopp’s town and revolution as history and a manifesto : a reactualization of Russian constructivism in the West in the 1960sen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.volume14en
dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*


Files associated with this item

Icon
Icon

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International